Were Naaman and Ard the sons or the grandsons of Benjamin?
The two lists put Ard and Naaman at different generational levels within Benjamin's family.
- Textual conflict
- Interpretive tension
- The passages pull in different directions, but the conflict depends on how their wording, scope, or narrative context is read.
- Importance
- Minor
- A local detail in a story, chronology, or inventory.
Ard and Naaman appear beside Bela as sons of Benjamin but elsewhere as Bela's sons; the tension depends on whether sons denotes immediate children.
An editorial assessment of the quoted passages. Importance describes the stakes; it does not increase certainty. Reading order weighs both.
Naaman and Ard are listed as Benjamin's sons
And the sons of Benjamin were Belah, and Becher, and Ashbel, Gera, and Naaman, Ehi, and Rosh, Muppim, and Huppim, and Ard.
Ard and Naaman are listed as Bela's sons
And the sons of Bela were Ard and Naaman: of Ard, the family of the Ardites: and of Naaman, the family of the Naamites.