Does anyone ever do anything good?
Categorical denials that anyone does good conflict with descriptions of people who have done good. A denial of sinless perfection is a different, weaker claim.
- Textual conflict
- Interpretive tension
- The passages pull in different directions, but the conflict depends on how their wording, scope, or narrative context is read.
- Importance
- Foundational
- A central claim about origins, salvation, divine justice, or religious authority.
Categorical moral-corruption language contrasts with people credited with good deeds, but the rhetoric may assess overall righteousness rather than deny every comparatively good act.
An editorial assessment of the quoted passages. Importance describes the stakes; it does not increase certainty. Reading order weighs both.
No one is said to do good
They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one.
Every one of them is gone back: they are altogether become filthy; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.